Quote:
I've been told the website is an unsalvageable mess and need to be totally redone.
As a web developer, I can honestly say that describes it the day it launched -- as someone who maintained the official Classic Battletech website for nearly a decade, I can honestly say the compromises I made to meet the whims of those running things that didn't surprise me one iota given the laundry list of problems I was never given the money, manpower, or control to fix.
... and I didn't put half the effort into that site I should have, but that goes with what I was getting paid for it not even covering the cost of hosting it. To then have their accountant call me wondering why I wasn't filing taxes for ten times the amount I was getting paid because that was what was showing on their books? Their general apathy about what was the only real face of the product at the time sure as shine-ola didn't help matters, an apathy and ignorance only further emphasized by the current inaccessible broken insecure train wreck of turdpress they have in place now... Turdpress, for people who know dick about running a website, BY people who know dick about building a website!
That they had some art faygelah scam artist who knew jack about actual web development saddle them up and take them for a ride with the TRAIN WRECK of how not to build a business website that they quite clearly have? DOOMED them from the start. Again, I'm SHOCKED it has held on as long as it has given that from a usability, speed, and accessibility standpoint the site might as well be something slopped together by a pre-teen in 1998 using Frontpage or Nyetscape composer.
Just to give an example, see this ignorant halfwit BULLSHIT:
Code:
<body bgcolor=#000033 style="margin: 0">
<table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0 width=100% style="height: 100%">
<tr><td><div class="header" align=center>
<table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr><td>
<a href="index.html">
<img src="https://d3eokp2tauoved.cloudfront.net/BC2/img/logo01_hq.jpg" width=256
height=80 border=0 alt="BattleCorps" /></a></td>
<td class="loggedIn" align=right valign=bottom
style="background-image: url(https://d3eokp2tauoved.cloudfront.net/BC2/img/atlas01_hq.jpg)">
<img src="https://d3eokp2tauoved.cloudfront.net/BC2/img/1.gif"
width=444 height=21 border=0 alt="" title="" /></td></tr></table></div>
Doing the job of:
Code:
<body>
<div id="top">
<h1>Battlecorps</h1>
... and that would even be keeping the same (broken inaccessible fixed width asshat) appearance. Fixed width layout, inaccessible fixed metric fonts, overuse of images making the page take forever to load, and wasting 21k of markup on delivering 1.26k of plaintext and four content images -- EASILY six to eight times the HTML alone that should have been used.
They were saddled up and taken for a ride by an art faygelah under the DELUSION they know what design is. Whoever built that site isn't qualified to shine shoes for a living.
But to be fair, I say the same thing about the current Battletech logo which doesn't fit the print products, doesn't fit websites, it just doesn't fit anything other than "oh look at how some artist spanked it on a graphics tablet" -- which is why when I was being told to use it I ended up damned near reworking it from scratch... I also say the same thing about damned near every logo in the "field manuals" of the past fifteen years, just wanting to say "how the hell are you gonna stencil that with a spraycan in thirty seconds?!?" It's what happens when you let artsy fartsy types spank it in the corner with zero concerns for limitations of the target medium, accessibility norms, or any of the actual engineering concepts that separates design from art.... and right now there are FAR too many artists dicking around in Photoshop or Illustrator under the DELUSION that they are designers.
Though we're talking the company that went with a puke green for the company logo that was below accessibility/legibility minimums, and trusted their marketing dipshit artists opinion on that when they said "It's unique, nobody else is using this shade" without considering
WHY nobody else was using it!
Form over function artsy fartsy BS so typical of what happens when artists take over an industry... screwing the consumer AND the client as they hock their hoodoo-voodoo bekaptah asshattery. You'd almost think they were Mac ****ots.
But no, lemme tell you what I REALLY think.
-- edit -- manually added carriage returns to code sample as apparently there's no max-width set on <pre> tags in phpBB... speaking of developer ineptitude..