do you feel this is a good use of the LPPC's?
would you use this?
Code:
Type/Model: Scandal
Mass: 30 tons
Equipment: Items Mass
Int. Struct.: 15 pts Standard 0 3.00
Engine: 170 Fusion 0 6.00
Shielding & Transmission Equipment: 0 3.00
Cruise MP: 10
Flank MP: 15
Heat Sinks: 10 Single 0 .00
Cockpit & Controls: 0 1.50
Crew: 2 Members 0 .00
Lift Equipment: 0 3.00
Turret Equipment: 0 1.00
Armor Factor: 116 pts Ferro-Fibrous 2 6.50
Internal Armor
Structure Value
Front: 3 35
Left / Right Sides: 3 23/23
Rear: 3 16
Turret: 3 19
Weapons and Equipment Loc Heat Ammo Items Mass
--------------------------------------------------------
2 Light PPCs* Turret 10 2 6.00
--------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS: 10 4 30.00
Items & Tons Left: 7 .00
Calculated Factors:
Total Cost: 1,568,000 C-Bills
Battle Value: 509
Cost per BV: 3,080.55
Weapon Value: 327 / 327 (Ratio = .64 / .64)
Damage Factors: SRDmg = 8; MRDmg = 6; LRDmg = 2
BattleForce2: MP: 10H, Armor/Structure: 0 / 4
Damage PB/M/L: 1/1/1, Overheat: 0
Class: GL; Point Value: 5
Hunter Industrial Technologies first forray into non-sttandard partical cannon vehicles was designed and constructed under much controversy. A swift light hover craft that mounts a pair of Light Partical Prjection Cannons is what the design team came up with. Now the source of the LPPC technology is under great debate by trade commisions and several heavy weight industrial power. So the test teams dubbed it - The Scandal.
thoughts, comments, critiques
Login
FAQ
Search
